Falk HirdesFalk Hirdes

Core Framework

Navigating Arenas of Change

Not another change methodology. A navigation system. It helps you figure out which arena you're operating in — then choose the right existing tools for that specific context.

3D Framework Diagram

[Visual placeholder — GO × FC × LE coordinate system]

5 × 2 × 2 = 20 arenas

Three Dimensions

GO — Grade of Organization5 levels

GO1: IndividualGO2: TeamGO3: DepartmentGO4: EnterpriseGO5: Community

Change behaves differently at each level. What works for a team of eight won't scale to a department of eight hundred. The framework starts by asking: where in the organization are you actually operating?

FC — Focus of Change2 types

FC1: Strategic — wave ridingFC2: Tactical — flow riding

Strategic change is like surfing — you see the wave coming, you position, you commit. Tactical change is like cycling through Beijing traffic — continuous micro-adjustments, negotiated in real time. Both are change. They require completely different skills.

LE — Level of Enablement2 levels

LE1: Enabling myselfLE2: Enabling others

Are you navigating your own change, or helping someone else navigate theirs? The skills overlap but the stance is fundamentally different. Most frameworks ignore this distinction.

Key Concepts

BANI > VUCA

The world isn't just volatile and uncertain — it's Brittle, Anxious, Non-linear, and Incomprehensible. BANI is the operating condition. The framework is built for it.

Curiosity → Passion → Change

The CPC progression. Change doesn't start with a burning platform. It starts with someone getting curious enough to look closer.

Pattern Breakers

Four levers for shifting behavior: Personal Skill, Personal Motivation, Structural Signals, Social Signals. Pull the wrong lever, nothing moves.

Negotiated Flow

Falk's concept for tactical change navigation. Inspired by cycling Beijing traffic — continuous, responsive, co-created movement without central control.

Wave vs. Flow

Surfing for strategic change, cycling for tactical. Two metaphors that capture fundamentally different dynamics of navigating transformation.

Resilience < Relevance

Bouncing back isn't enough. The real question is whether you're still relevant after the change. Resilience is survival. Relevance is thriving.